unless i am missing something splitting the stock does not have any value one way or the other. Shareholders are left with the same percentage ownership interest in the company before and after the split. For such a great company that otherwise seems to be quite rational and shareholder focused, why does Heico engage in this practice? There is nothing inherently wrong or right with doing it but it just seems odd. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
Marked as spam
Please log in to post questions.